About ME
Together we can do so much
WELCOME TO MY CYBER POLICY JOURNEY!
Explore my dynamic portfolio showcasing impactful collaborations—all centered around the passion for cyber policy and curiosity for building resilient digital societies.
WHY CHOOSE COLLABORATION?
The last seven years have taught me that navigating today’s complex governance landscape requires innovative policy development methods that go beyond traditional approaches. In the realm of cybersecurity, success hinges on fostering a culture of trust, transparency, collaboration, and knowledge sharing. Recognizing this, numerous multi-stakeholder initiatives have emerged in the past years, positively impacting information security.
Despite these strides, there is still lots to do. I recognize the pressing need for new approaches to policy making and implemention. Policies often face challenges, from technical communities rejecting impractical implementation proposals to overlooking key stakeholders. Instances of policies being ignored or neutralized through workarounds are not uncommon. The result? Wasted public funds due to double efforts, poor coordination, and inadequate analysis and ultimately policies that do not reach their well-intended outcomes.
Motivated by these observations, I am committed to providing solutions and supporting people and organisations that aim to make our digital societies more resilient. Whether it’s by facilitating a productive discussion, providing a collaborative environment, advising on facilitation methods and tools or implementing creative ways to extend policy reach beyond the cybersecurity bubble, my aim is to enhance inclusivity, productivity, and accessibility in policy discussions.
ENTER CYBER POLICY HAUS
I founded the Cyber Policy Haus to be able to gather experts, policymakers, implementers and creatives under „one roof“ with one mission, values and mindset in mind. The inception of Cyber Policy Haus was driven by my desire to collaborate with creative minds from different fields like design and software development in the pursuit of crafting groundbreaking solutions for policy development, implementation, and communication. Our mission includes addressing challenges like scalability in collaboration formats.
At Cyber Policy Haus, policy makers and implementers can partner with designers, facilitators and leverage cutting-edge technologies to enhance policy accessibility, fostering a collaborative approach to both policy creation and implementation. The story of Cyber Policy Haus is only getting started, over the next months we will be sharing more of what we are up to on LinkedIn and on our website.
HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOU?
Whether you’re in cybersecurity, public policy, design, digitalization, or event organization, I’m eager to discuss how I can contribute to your goals.
Below you can find some formats and projects that I have implemented in past.
Let’s connect with a brief call to explore potential collaborations.
COLLABS
Leverage the power of connections
Tailor-Made Cyber Policy Exercises
Cybersecurity policy exercises are designed to assess and enhance a stakeholder’s readiness to handle cybersecurity challenges. Tailored exercises enable participants to navigate and respond to simulated cyber threats, testing the effectiveness of existing policies, procedures, and collaboration mechanisms. The goal is to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement in cybersecurity strategies, fostering a proactive and resilient approach to safeguarding digital infrastructures.
Implemented
- March 2024, Facilitator Training, iLab of the Bundeswehr Command and Staff College in Hamburg
Although this training specifically focused on Neustart, Julia’s introduction to a Cyber Tabletop Exercise was a perfect fit for the occasion. With Julia’s help, we were able to widen the horizon of all participants by providing another valuable methodical and didactic input.
Thorsten Kodalle, Head of iLab at Bundeswehr Command and Staff College
- 20th of February 2024, Cybersecurity Policy Exercise Tabletop for Digital Leadership Seminar by Federal Academy of Security Policy (BAKS)
Country-Specific National Response Exercises
Country-specific cybersecurity policy exercises refer to simulation or training programs designed to test, assess, and improve a nation’s cybersecurity policies and practices. These exercises are tailored to the specific context, challenges, and policies of a particular country.
We experienced firsthand that cybersecurity policy exercises are useful tools, for example, with which to practice information sharing and analysis across sectors during an incident. This utility stems from the fact that such exercises offer participants the opportunity to discuss a hypothetical yet realistic cyber incident scenario and to experience policy responses.
They also offer the opportunity to create multi-stakeholder dialogue afterwards and collect concrete ideas and formats to work on challenges identified in the exercise.
Beigel & Schuetze (2022) Cybersecurity Policy Exercises in Practice, SNV.
Past Exercises
From July 2021 to July 2022, I was part of the team at SNV which crafted country-specific cybersecurity policy exercises implemented in seven countries worldwide, including Armenia, Costa Rica, Jordan, Kenya, Mexico, and South Africa. This initiative was a collaborative effort with the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). Some of these exercises took place on-site, whereas others were carried out online because of the COVID-19 pandemic. They typically convened participants from governmental and private sector institutions, civil society organizations, and academia. Designing country-specific cybersecurity policy exercises necessitated profound methodological expertise and a deep understanding of each country’s cybersecurity policies. Rigorous research into their policies and close collaboration with on-site stakeholders formed the foundation for our design. Some of the background research conducted has been published by SNV here.
Awareness-Raising Scenario Workshops
Workshops, as a type of exercise, offer a conducive environment for in-depth learning and exploration. Particularly valuable in raising awareness of cybersecurity topics, this format proves effective in engaging newcomers to the field, including students, young professionals, and citizens. Scenario workshops provide a unique blend of immersive scenario exploration and reflective learning opportunities. Notably versatile, they can be seamlessly implemented remotely with less preparation, making them an accessible and efficient tool for knowledge dissemination. Depending on the context, I designed and faciliated scenario workshops on different topics, such as international cyber diplomacy or election security.
Past Scenario-Workshops
Disclaimer: The following workshops I implemented in my capacity as employee of Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
- Federal Foreign Office & DGAP International Futures
- Cusanuswerk Ferienakademie Regenstauf
- Mariaspring – Ländliche Heimvolkshochschule e. V.
- Tönissteiner Kreis
- Arbeitskreis für Sicherheitspolitik an der Universität Münster
- Haus Rissen Institut für internationale Politik und Wirtschaft
- Evangelische Studierendengemeinde Jena
Co-Creation Workshops
Workshops serve as a powerful tool to actively involve stakeholders with diverse backgrounds, expertise, and interests in the analysis of specific policy problems or the collaborative creation of policy solutions. Their objectives, duration, and specific methods can be readily tailored to fit the unique context, ensuring a flexible and effective approach to policy engagement.
Upcoming
- 23. April 2024 – Gemeinsam Cybersicherheit erhöhen – Formate für die Interne Revision, a Cyber Policy Haus Workshop, 17. DIIR-Tagung: Interne Revision in Öffentlichen Institutionen, in Berlin Link
Past
Disclaimer: All workshops implemented between 2017 and 2023 were in my capacity as employee with Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V
- 2022 – Kommunale Informationssicherheit erhöhen, with federal, state, and local level government experts in Germany, in Berlin
- 2022 – International Deployment for Incident Response, with experts of the Transatlantic Cyber Forum, virtual Link
- 2020 – Virtual Cybersecurity Policy Simulations as a Tool – Questions of Design for Country-Specific Simulations, with international cyber exercise experts, virtual, Link
- 2020 – The EU’s Joint Response: Impact, Coordination and Cooperation with Australia?, virtual, Link
- 2019 – EU-Japan Joint Responses to Malicious Cyber Activities, with EU Cyber Direct and keio University, in Tokyo, Link
- 2019 – EU-US Cyber Consultation on Joint Responses to Malicious Cyber Activities, with EU Cyber Direct and German Marshall Fund in Washington D.C., Link
- 2018 – EU-US Cyber Diplomacy Workshop on Transatlantic Cyber Policy Research Initiative, with EU Cyber Direct and German Marshall Fund, In Washington D.C. Link
Explaining Cyber Policy Using Media
Different media formats elucidate various facets of cyber policies and provide insights on policy development. Media can be a great means to reach a wider audience and actively contribute to making cyber policy more accessible to different communities.
Upcoming
- March 2024 – Planned Guest at Ereignishorizont Podcast – With Jonas & Larin I will be chatting about „Is technological progress exponential? Are we heading towards some kind of “singularity”? And what does this mean for cybersecurity and a digital society? https://ereignishorizont.de/
Past Radio, Podcasts, TV or YouTube Outings
- January 2024 – „Das soll die BSI-Zentralstelle leisten“, Tagesspiegel Background Cybersecurity, Link
Disclaimer: All media clips implemented between 2017 and 2023 were in my capacity as employee with Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V
- 2023 – EU seeks to bridge cyber-skills gap with new ‘academy’, EURACTIV, Link
- 2022 – Cyber-Erpresser greifen an? Was dann? | mal angenommen – tagesschau-Podcast, Link
„Deutschland könne viel von der Ukraine lernen. Trotz des andauernden Krieges sei dort die digitale Verwaltung ebenso wie Telekommunikationsdienste weitgehend in Takt. Wegen des mindestens seit 2014 seitens Russlands auch mit Cyberoperationen ausgetragenen Konflikts habe die Ukraine Cyberresilienz hoch priorisiert und in entsprechend robuste Strukturen und Krisenfähigkeiten investiert, daran solle man sich ein Beispiel nehmen“
Tagesspiegel Background, 22. Juni 2022 Link
- 2022 – E.U., U.K. and U.S. accuse Russia of cyberattack on internet provider, NBC News, Link
- 2021 – Die Krux mit dem gehackten Kreuz, DLF Kultur, Link
- 2021 – AIES Podcast Ep. 8 – Cyber Security Exercises, AIES, Link
- 2021 – Schaltgespräch mit Julia Schuetze, about election security, Phoenix, Link
- 2021 – W.I.P. Talk #4 „Der Feind aus dem Cyberspace„, Link
- 2021 – Die Wahl vor Angriffen schützen, Tagesschau, Link
- 2021 – Warum wir nicht digital wählen – Julia Schütze auf der TINCON 2021, Link
Let’s get creative!
There can be different ways on how policymakers and implementers can engage – let’s get creative here. Do you want to get feedback on policy ideas? Do you want to assess the accessibility of polices or understand better the implication of policies on the ground?
Example Case Study: A Website As A Guide To Policy Implication
The Cybersecurity Compass, is a website for local government staff in Germany to find the different services from state and federal level government. Depending on which state a city is located, they have access to different services – which are driven by policies. Instead of reading a paper, this website showcases the impact of policies on service availability and allows easier overview and access to engage with the different stakeholders involved.
Disclaimer: This project I implemented in my capacity as employee with Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V and am now volunteering to keep it up and running.
Check out the website yourself: Here
Talks, Panels & Roundtables
Talks and panels, when skillfully facilitated and structured, serve as excellent platforms for exchanging views and fostering multi-stakeholder dialogues to enhance understanding of specific topics.
Upcoming
- 27th of March 2024 – The challenge of public-private partnerships at the local level – Roundtable at InCyber Forum, Lille Link
- 22nd of April 2024 – Cybersicherheitspolitik und Interne Revision – Eine symbiotische Beziehung?, a Cyber Policy Haus Talk, 17. DIIR Interne Revision in Öffentlichen Institutionen, in Berlin Link
Past Talks & Panels
- February 2024 – Ransomware: how to protect cities and communities?, organized by Gaurnault & Associates with support of US Mission France, in Deauville France, Link
- December 2023 – Cyber Capacity Building – Strengthening Digital Defence, Common Effort Conference, in colab with Friedrich Naumann Stiftung e.V. in Hamburg
Disclaimer: All talks and panel implemented between 2017 and September 2023 were in my capacity as employee with Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V
- 2022 – Cybersecurity and the Indo-Pacific: Options for EU-Japan Cooperation, Japan-Europe Forum, European Council On Foreign Relations
- 2022 – Cybersecurity of Electoral Processes, Strengthening Democracy – Towards Resilient Institutions and Societies in the G7 and Africa“, German Federal Foreign Office, Link
- 2022 – Rolle der Kommunen in der Cybersicherheitspolitik, 8. kommunaler IT-Sicherheitskongress, Deutscher Landkreistag, in Berlin, Link
- 2022 – Smart Cities sicher gestalten: Cybersicherheit für resiliente Städte, Smart Country Convention, Link
- 2022 – Gemeinsam sicherer – Wie können Länder mit Bund und EU Cybersicherheit stärken?, Zukunftskongress, Link
- 2022 – Cyberkrieg – Welche Bedrohung schafft die Ukraine-Krise?, Potsdamer Konferenz für Nationale Cybersicherheit, Link
- 2021 – „digitalization, cyber security and resilience, European Strategic Choices Cybersecurity, Chatham House, Link
- 2021 – Cybersanktionen: Zunehmende Anwendung eines neuen Instruments, GIGA Forum, Link
- 2021 – E-Voting – wann, wenn nicht jetzt?, Mehr Demokratie e.V., Link
- 2020 – «Roles for diplomats – Joint Responses to malicious cyber activities», Avenir Suisse, in Zurich, Link
- 2020 – The invisible work of cybersecurity researchers with Chris Kubecka, SNV Background Talk, online
- 2019 – IGF 2019 WS #159 Towards a Human Rights-Centered Cybersecurity Training, in Berlin, Link
Publications
I think deeply about things and sometimes I write it down
Government and election security is vital for preserving democratic values, maintaining public trust, protecting national security, preventing manipulation, ensuring social stability, establishing global credibility, and safeguarding economic well-being. My past publication focus on cybersecurity of local government in a federal system and election security.
- Schuetze (2023), Municipal Information Security and Resilience – An analysis of the German approach to support, Konrad Adenauer Foundation
An increasing number of IT security incidents in municipal administrations have left behind some noticeable damage for citizens. In the worst case, the administration no longer functioned and municipal services could not be provided. Municipalities are initially responsible for their own information security and are supported by the federal and state governments. Read the analysis to find out which services are available to the municipalities, which functions the federal and state governments assume and what is necessary to improve resilience at the municipal level.
- Schuetze (2023), Wie sich die Informationssicherheit von deutschen Städten verbessern lässt – eine Bedarfsanalyse in 34 Städten, Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
The present needs analysis is based on the survey of 56 employees from 34 cities in a dozen federal states in focus groups. It highlights the needs and demands of municipal employees in the field of information security. The second part of the analysis presents specific improvement suggestions.
- Herpig & Schuetze (2018), Securing Democracy in Cyberspace – An Approach to Protecting Data-Driven Elections, Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
At the time of research cyber incidents on elections where just getting noticed by a wider audience – e.g. now well known cases in the US 2016 or in France 2017. But as a transatlantic working group set out in the beginning of 2017 to analyse election security cases globally, no framework existed. This paper is the result of two-year long research into different cases and the development of a analytical framework as well as recommendations informed by the input of experts from different backgrounds and countries. As cyber incidents on elections have not stopped, the paper is as relevant today as it was then.
- Schuetze & Jaursch (2020), IT-Sicherheit im US Wahlkampf, Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung
The analysis looks at how the USA was preparing itself against disinformation and cyber operations in the election campaign and gave an overview of the lessons from Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election.
- Schuetze (2018), Warum dem Staat IT-Sicherheitsexpert:innen fehlen, Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
At the time of research Germany experienced a lack of cybersecurity experts in the public sector. The analysis set out to understand the reasons and evaluated two approaches and whether they address the those reasons enough to close the gap.
Mutual assistance in cybersecurity is vital for addressing the global and interconnected nature of cyber threats. It promotes information sharing, capacity building, coordinated responses, and the establishment of international norms, ultimately contributing to a more secure and resilient digital landscape.
- Schuetze and Daukšienė (2023), Cybersecurity Support Deployments: An emerging cooperative approach, Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
Over the past years, the subject of cybersecurity has become a priority among governments around the world, and there has been a growing interest in designing new and more robust forms of cooperation. In this context, our newest paper looks at a practice that we have come to call „cybersecurity support deployment“, where professionals from one country provide support to another based on their government’s decision involving a cybersecurity-related activity or resources, such as hardware and software.
The paper aims to better understand how cybersecurity support deployments take place by looking at real life examples. It identifies 16 relevant cases and analyzes common procedures within this type of cybersecurity cooperation using a purpose-developed framework. Finally, in an attempt to better bridge the gap between policy research and current practices, our report offers some recommendations for governments interested in using deployments as a policy tool.
Cybersecurity exercises play a vital role in proactive cybersecurity measures by providing practical experience, identifying vulnerabilities, improving coordination, testing response plans, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement and preparedness against evolving cyber threats.
- Schuetze and Beigel (2021), Cybersecurity Exercises for Policy Work, Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
After holding eight exercises in eight countries, on-site and online, we can conclude summerized learning for organizing, designing and facilitating cybersecurity policy exercises and consluded that they are a useful and important tool for preparing national stakeholders to respond together to cyber threats. We found that in order for these exercises to be implemented well and to have a sustainable effect, a number of points must be considered – which we share in the paper.
- Beigel & Schuetze (2022), Cybersecurity Policy Exercises in Practice – Learnings from Implementing Tabletop Exercises in Different Countries, Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
The information design above is by Ulf Seißenschmidt. The paper creates a simple guide for exploring the potential application of cybersecurity exercises for policy work and for strategically using them. It is recommended to go through a three-step process to find whether cybersecurity exercises are an instrument to be used for a specific policy objective.
Cyber diplomacy is essential for building international cooperation, establishing norms, preventing conflicts, resolving incidents peacefully, promoting trust, protecting human rights, fostering global cybersecurity capacity, addressing cybercrime, leveraging digital diplomacy, and safeguarding economic and trade relations in the digital age.
- Schuetze (2020), EU-US Cybersecurity Policy Coming Together: Recommendations for instruments to accomplish joint strategic goals , EU Cyber Direct
In 2018, achieving concrete steps for collaboration between the EU and the US on a broader strategic level, particularly in responding to malicious cyber activities, was challenging. The dynamic threat landscape targeting their values and ways of life led both entities to prioritize the development of their individual processes and policy approaches from 2018 to 2020. Consequently, this analysis aimed to identify practical actions for joint implementation by the EU and the US. The approach involves first establishing common strategic goals and analyzing shared elements in their cybersecurity policies.
The approach allowed a broader perspective on what the EU and US joint strategic goals really
are, and what is feasible to do together – turns out the EU and US had 32 policy instruments in common of which are 20 feasible to do together. Read the paper to find out which ones they are.
- Schuetze (2020), Japan’s cybersecurity policy: an introduction, EU Cyber Direct
Following two research missions to Japan, talking with over 50 local stakeholders, this analysis is a summary for Europeans on cybersecurity policy of Japan at the time of writing.
- Schuetze (2019), How to operationalise a Transatlantic Cyber Policy Research Initative (TCPRI), EU Cyber Direct
In 2016, the European Union and the United States agreed on the launch of the Transatlantic Cyber Policy Research Initiative (TCPRI) as a key component for EU-US cooperation on cybersecurity policy, but the provisions still remained largely theoretical. Taking up the idea for implementation, this paper summarizes a collaborative analysis from a transatlantic expert group which considered challenges, identified why the TCPRI initiative was still relevant and proposed how the TCPRI could be implemented, considering institutional setup, working methods and its relationship to policy-makers.
- Schuetze (2019), Germany’s Responses to Large Scale Malicious Cyber Incidents and Opportunities for AUS-GER future cooperation, Konrad Adenauer Foundation Australia
For the Periscope edition on cybersecurity, this analysis looked at Germany’s foreign policy responses, its engagement and diplomatic efforts on cybersecurity and assess their impact on relations with Australia at the time.
Germany and the EU are pivotal for cybersecurity due to their economic influence, technological advancements, commitment to data protection, political standing, critical infrastructure, collaborative initiatives, response to cross-border threats, investment in research, and the vision of a secure Digital Single Market. As a EU citizen born in Germany, I have had the opportunity to comment on policies coming from the EU or Germany.
- Schuetze (2023),„Cybersicherheit – Zuständigkeiten und Instrumente in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Stellungnahme für die öffentliche Anhörung des Ausschusses für Digitales“, German Bundestag
In my statement, I focus primarily on selected reform and optimization measures aimed at improving the collaboration between the federal, state, and municipal levels, particularly with regard to the implementation of NIS-2, which I see as an opportunity to enhance federal cooperation in Germany. Three aspects are particularly important to me: firstly, defining the contribution of the states; secondly, optimizing information exchange to promote resilience; and thirdly, involving municipal administrations in the implementation of NIS-2.
- Schuetze (2020), Deutsche Cyber Defense Strategie – für die öffentlich Anhörung des Verteidigungsausschusses, German Bundestag
In my statement, I focus on German activities in the field of cyber defense and argue that these should derive from a country’s understanding of its own security policy. At the time of the statement, I saw the committee as an opportunity to initiate a discourse and to critically examine how the new developments in cyber defense policy align with the country’s security policy stance. What new measures align with Germany’s security policy?
- Schuetze (2020), Wehrhaftigkeit der demokratischen Verfasstheit der EU und Integrität von Willensbildung – für die öffentlich Anhörung Bundestagsausschusses für die Angelegenheiten der Europäischen Union
In the statement, I demonstrate:
- that data not directly related to democratic processes can also be misused for attacks (e.g., personal data, private communication). The potential attack surface is therefore larger than initially apparent.
- that attackers may have various motivations, such as delegitimizing the democratic process, undermining trust in democracy, and discrediting actors. Understanding these motivations can provide insights into the goals or further actions of the attackers. that in cyber attacks, the possibility that it may not be an external attack is too infrequently considered. Potential „insiders“ could thus be overlooked.
- that a cyber attack does not necessarily have to be successful to erode trust in the democratic process. The perception of such attempted attacks is strongly influenced by communication about them.
Measures to protect elections should focus on two main areas: Improved cybersecurity for elections and the coordinated EU-wide response to cyber attacks on elections.
Cyber diplomacy is essential for building international cooperation, establishing norms, preventing conflicts, resolving incidents peacefully, promoting trust, protecting human rights, fostering global cybersecurity capacity, addressing cybercrime, leveraging digital diplomacy, and safeguarding economic and trade relations in the digital age. In the past, I have shared my view on specific EU cyber diplomacy developments to highlight specific options for improvement.
- Schuetze & Liedekerke (2021),„The EU Response to SolarWinds, Council on Foreign Relations Net Politics
- Schuetze (2020),„Could the German International Arrest Warrant Against a GRU Hacker Prompt European Sanctions?“, Council on Foreign Relations Net Politics
- Schuetze (2020), The Future of EU-US Cyber Cooperation, EU Directions Blog
The choice of methods in cybersecurity is fundamental for achieving effectiveness, adaptability, efficiency, risk mitigation, compliance, integration, cost-efficiency, user awareness, continuous improvement, and organizational resilience in the face of evolving cyber threats. Next to the more in-depth studies on exercises as a method (please see under Policy Analysis) I have written on a few other methods in cybersecurity policy that can be found below.
- Schuetze (2021), Wie schützt man sich vor Datenklau? Überblick behalten!, +3 Magazin
- Schuetze (2020), Voneinander Lernen für effektivere Cybersicherheitspolitik, Crises Prevention, Fachportal für Gefahrenabwehr, Innere Sicherheit und Katastrophenhilfe
- Schuetze (2018), Open Government in der Praxis: Denkwerkstatt sichere Informationsgesellschaft, Open Government Partnership Network
CV
Connecting the dots
October 2023 –
Cyber Policy Haus
Founder, CEO & Facilitator
October 2020 – September 2023
Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
Project Director
May 2017 – September 2020
Stiftung Neue Verantwortung e.V.
Project Manager
June 2016 – August 2016
The Berkman Klein Center for Internet& Society, Harvard University
Harvard Open Access Project Assistant Researcher
June 2015 – April 2017
Wikimedia Germany e.V.
Legal and Software Communication Support
August 2015 – September 2017
University of Bath, University of Washington Seattle, Humboldt-University Berlin
M.A. Contemporary European Studies (Politics, Policy and Society) with transatlantic track
September 2011 – May 2015
University of Stirling, with exchange year at University of North Carolina Wilmington
B.A. with Joint Honours in Journalism Studies and Politics
October 2023 – now
Center for Cyber Strategy and Policy, University of Cincinnati
External Affiliate Researcher
January 2024 – now
EU Cyber Net
Expert
September 2016 – now
Open Government Partnership
Member
August 2017 – April 2019
Internet Governance Forum
Youth Ambassador
January 2023 – now
Denkwerkstatt Cybersicherheit im Dialog
Co-Lead of Workstream Local Government Resilience
November 2022 – now
International Cybersecurity Forum
Board Member
December 2022 – September 2023
Federal Office for Information Security Germany (BSI)
Member of Advisory Board on Digital Consumer Protection
Events
How to boost cyber resilience of towns, communities, and cities
What do Baltimore, Anhalt Bitterfeld, and Witten have in common? They are three local governments which all were challenged to remain operational and…
How to boost cyber resilience of towns, communities, and cities
What do Baltimore, Anhalt Bitterfeld, and Witten have in common? They are three local governments which all were challenged to remain operational and…
Contact
Cybersecurity is a contact sport
Gaston Crommenlaan 8
9050 Gent
For now, please use calendly to contact me or call +32 929 69 209 – I may add other forms of contact in the future. 🙂